PapeRman #5

对抗健壮性的研究非常具有挑战性。在众多研究方向中,存在一些相应的进展。本篇论文是一个较清楚的整理,有助于大家更好地理解对抗网络的工作机制。

On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness

Authors: Nicholas Carlini1, Anish Athalye2, Nicolas Papernot1, Wieland Brendel3, Jonas Rauber3,
Dimitris Tsipras2, Ian Goodfellow1, Aleksander Mądry2
Institutes: 1 Google Brain 2 MIT 3 University of Tübingen

Correctly evaluating defenses against adversarial examples has proven to be extremely difficult. Despite the significant amount of recent work attempting to design defenses that withstand adaptive attacks, few have succeeded; most papers that propose defenses are quickly shown to be incorrect.

We believe a large contributing factor is the difficulty of performing security evaluations. In this paper, we discuss the methodological foundations, review commonly accepted best practices, and suggest new methods for evaluating defenses to adversarial examples. We hope that both researchers developing defenses as well as readers and reviewers who wish to understand the completeness of an evaluation consider our advice in order to avoid common pitfalls.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is screenshot-from-2019-01-17-01-49-57.png

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s